Friday, May 29, 2015

Controversial Therapies

There are many approaches that claim to 'cure' Dyslexia. Some have strong anecdotal support. The International Dyslexia Association published a review of several popular, yet controversial, therapies for students with Dyslexia. Included are the programs for Vision Therapy, Fast For Word, Brain-Gym and other movement-based programs. Here is a link for their review:

http://www.onlinedigeditions.com/allarticle/13959/59673/59673/allarticle.html

Additional medical review of Vision Therapy:

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Ophthalmology/GeneralOphthalmology/51750






Monday, May 11, 2015

UCSF Research Study- Participants Requested

Below is information on a research study to further understand the root cause of Dyslexia. A functional MRI (fMRI) is a fairly recent tool that allows researchers to look at the brain in a non-invasive way. If you fit the criteria, this would be an excellent opportunity to further the field of research and information on Dyslexia! See below, or go to http://dyslexia.ucsf.edu/  for more information.


Reading and the Brain Study at UCSF brainLENS

Posted: May 08, 2015
Drawing of a person wearing headphone, with their brain visibleWe are pleased to share this information from EdRev speaker Dr. Fumiko Hoeft of the Dyslexia Center @ UCSF
At UCSF brainLENS (Laboratory for Educational Neuroscience, Director: Fumiko Hoeft MD PhD), we are now conducting a one of a kind neuroscience research study. Our hope is to further our understanding of the cause of dyslexia and other related disorders. It is the most comprehensive study using the latest and the largest number of different brain imaging technologies. UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) is a clinical and biomedical research institution that consistently ranks amongst the top 5 in world rankings.
Eligibility:
  • 19-45 years with family or personal reading or phonological problems
  • Right-handed
  • Native English Speaker
  • Normal hearing
  • Not claustrophobic
  • No history of seizures or other neurological problems
  • Not currently taking medication for a psychiatric condition
Participation involves:
  • Cognitive and behavioral evaluation
  • Brain imaging using safe, non-invasive MRI and MEG scans that do not use X-rays or radiation
  • Travel to UCSF and Stanford (travel expenses reimbursed)
  • At least three visits
You will receive:
  • Results of testing including an MRI image of your brain
  • Have access to ongoing updates about the outcomes of the study
  • An honorarium
For more information, or to enroll:

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Reading Fluency Norms

A lot of attention is given to fluency, but the measures are not always provided to parents regarding the expected rates of reading at different points. Fluency is the ability to read smoothly, accurately, with correct intonation and phrasing, and speed. I mention speed last because it is too often the only thing people think of when they hear 'fluency'. Speed is important because students need to be able to get through passages with enough mental energy left to think about the information they've read. However, it is not a good idea to encourage students to read as fast as they can. Speed comes naturally when decoding skills are strong, a large sight-word inventory is in place, and when correct phrasing for longer sentences is understood. If a student needs to build their speed of reading, these are the skills to address that will naturally build smoother reading.

Below is a chart from Reading Rockets (http://www.readingrockets.org/article/fluency-norms-chart)
It shows grade level expectations for reading rates broken up into Fall, Winter, Spring and by percentile achievement levels. When fluency is tested, it should be with grade level material that has never been read before (sometimes called a cold read). If errors are made during the reading, a deduction for each error is applied so that the score reflects the number of correct words read per minute.

2006 Hasbrouck & Tindal Oral Reading Fluency Data
Grade
Percentile
Fall WCPM*
Winter WCPM*
Spring WCPM*
Avg. Weekly
Improvement**
1
90
75
 
81
47
111
82
1.9
2.2
50
 
23
53
1.9
25
10
 
12
6
28
15
1.0
0.6
2
90
75
106
79
125
100
142
117
1.1
1.2
50
51
72
89
1.2
25
10
25
11
42
18
61
31
1.1
0.6
3
90
75
128
99
146
120
162
137
1.1
1.2
50
71
92
107
1.1
25
10
44
21
62
36
78
48
1.1
0.8
4
90
75
145
119
166
139
180
152
1.1
1.0
50
94
112
123
0.9
25
10
68
45
87
61
98
72
0.9
0.8
5
90
75
166
139
182
156
194
168
0.9
0.9
50
110
127
139
0.9
25
10
85
61
99
74
109
83
0.8
0.7
6
90
75
177
153
195
167
204
177
0.8
0.8
50
127
140
150
0.7
25
10
98
68
111
82
122
93
0.8
0.8
7
90
75
180
156
195
165
202
177
0.7
0.7
50
128
136
150
0.7
25
10
102
79
109
88
123
98
0.7
0.6
8
90
75
185
161
199
177
199
177
0.4
0.5
50
133
151
151
0.6
25
10
106
77
124
97
124
97
0.6
0.6